Maine judges’ mass recusal in trans sports case raises unanswered questions, legal expert says

Federal judges in Maine said they were compelled by their code of ethics to recuse themselves from a case brought forth by Maine GOP state Rep. Laurel Libby.

Libby, R-Bangor, is challenging her censure in the state legislature, which was issued in response to her opposition to transgender athletes competing in women’s high school sports.

Judges in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine, the state’s sole federal court district, announced Wednesday that they would all be recusing themselves from Libby’s case, forcing it to be moved to a court in Rhode Island. While the judges did not initially state any reasons explaining their mass recusal, Chief Judge Lance Walker said in a statement Wednesday evening that it was the result of a potential conflict of interest.

“The Judges of the District of Maine independently concluded that they are compelled by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges to recuse themselves because an employee of the District of Maine is involved in or directly impacted by the controversy underlying this litigation,” Walker said. “The case will remain in the District of Maine but has been specially assigned to judges in the District of Rhode Island.”

TRUMP ADMIN CUTS FUNDING TO MAINE UNIVERSITIES AS STATE DEFIES ORDER TO BAN TRANS ATHLETES FROM WOMEN’S SPORTS 

While Walker’s explanation shed some light on the reasoning behind the mass recusal, it failed to specify the exact nature of the conflict of interest. A Fox News Digital analysis of public records found that the transgender high school athlete at the center of Libby’s censure lawsuit – filed after she posted a photo of the athlete competing before transitioning – shares a last name with someone working in the U.S. District Court system for the District of Maine.

“It seems like there was a reasonable explanation for those judges to recuse, that they all did have a close relationship with someone related to the athlete,” said Carrie Campbell Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network. Severino said, when asked about the possible familial link: “My concern now is – how has this next judge been chosen? Because there are lots of questions about whether this judge is actually able to be impartial in the case.”

RILEY GAINES, LAUREL LIBBY RIP GAVIN NEWSOM, HAKEEM JEFFRIES OVER EXCUSES FOR TRANS ATHLETES IN WOMEN’S SPORTS 

Due to the judges’ recusal, Biden-appointed Judge Melissa DuBose of the District of Rhode Island will now oversee the case. 

During DuBose’s confirmation hearing in March 2024, Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., questioned DuBose over comments she made to a journalist about going through a “Marxist phase” at a certain point in her life. “Senator, I have never been a Marxist and I am not [currently] a Marxist,” DuBose said. 

In 2021, DuBose signed a letter alongside a slew of other Rhode Island judges, ensuring the LGBTQ community, racial minorities “and all under-represented communities” that “Rhode Island’s courts are their courts.” The letter followed a rally of thousands on the state House steps protesting police brutality.

SCHOOL DISTRICT BANS TRANS ATHLETES FROM GIRLS’ SPORTS AS STATE DEFIES TRUMP, SPARKING LOUD PRO-TRANS CHANTS 

Severino said it was “hard to imagine” that DuBose would be able to provide a fair trial in Libby’s case, which centers on highly contentious LGBTQ issues.

“It’s not clear to me how it was decided it was going to go to Rhode Island, as opposed to another jurisdiction nearby. There are other adjacent states the case could theoretically go to,” Severino pointed out. “Now that it has been moved, there are further concerns about the ability of this judge to be impartial.”

Libby declined to comment for this article, citing ongoing litigation. Maine House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, D-Biddeford, who is a defendant in Libby’s case, also cited the same reason for not wanting to comment. Maine House Clerk Robert Hunt, another defendant, did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.